On that note, the Ryzen 7 3700X also cruised to 318 in the more multithreading-heavy video editing test, as well as 392 in the multitasking test. Performance in our 4K CPU benchmarks should be very similar, but for clarity, the scores you’re about to read are averages between the two systems. I’ve tested the Ryzen 7 3700X with the aid of two pre-built PCs, the CCL Paladin and the Chillblast Fusion Axion, both of which use 16GB of DDR4 RAM, up-to-date AMD X570 motherboards and all-in-one watercoolers instead of basic air coolers. AMD will therefore be relying on the 7nm architecture to get more done in each cycle than in the 12nm process used by the Ryzen 7 2700X. And it’ll need it while the maximum boost speed is an improvement on the Ryzen 7 2700X’s 4.3GHz, the base clock speed has actually dropped from 3.7GHz. Like the rest of the 3rd-gen Ryzen range, the Ryzen 7 3700X chip is one of the first 7nm desktop processors, theoretically allowing for much greater efficiency. This might make the Ryzen 7 3700X look like a losing choice next to the Ryzen 9 3900X, which has 12 cores, 24 threads and boost clock speeds up to 4.4GHz, but there’s still a lot to be excited about. That includes gains from Precision Boost and Extended Frequency Range (XFR), so you’ll need to ensure it’s well-cooled to squeeze every last megahertz of boost speed out of it. The Ryzen 7 3700X uses eight physical cores and 16 total threads, with a base clock speed of 3.6GHz and a maximum boost clock speed of 4.4GHz. READ NEXT: The best Intel and AMD processors you can buy AMD Ryzen 7 3700X review: What you need to know Both the Core i9-9900K and Ryzen 9 3900X are priced around the £500 mark, so if it delivers high-end performance, the £300 Ryzen 7 3700X could still be the CPU most of us should buy. In a price/performance sweet spot, as it happens. But where does that leave what was formerly AMD’s flagship chip? The latter could be seen as a response to Intel’s Core i9-9900K: a CPU that can adeptly handle mainstream tasks like gaming, streaming and everyday multitasking while also having the muscle for enthusiast-grade video editing and encoding. Imagine an hour-long or more video, that’s a decent amount of time saved with the faster Ryzen 7 5800X.Best PC case 2022: Build a quiet, cool and stylish gaming PC from just £42 Transcoding video is definitely faster on the Ryzen 7 5800X, a full minute is shaved off, or 14% faster transcoding performance for video. Lastly, we used HandBrake to transcode a video on the CPU in H.264. Turning on PBO adds just a little bit more performance. The Ryzen 7 5800X is a whopping 30% faster in V-Ray CPU performance producing 11,759 vsamples compared to the Ryzen 7 3700X at 9,021 vsamples. V-Ray 5 is another great example of how much faster Zen 3 is at rendering compared to Zen 2. We even see PBO make it just a bit faster in victor. These are all significant performance improvements for rendering. In victor we see the Ryzen 7 5800X render the scene 21% faster than the Ryzen 7 3700X. In the pavillon_barcelona scene, the Ryzen 7 5800X renders it 20% quicker than the Ryzen 7 3700X. In the classroom scene, the Ryzen 7 5800X renders it 21% quicker than the Ryzen 7 3700X. Both CPUs have the same core and thread count, so it is exciting to see that the Ryzen 7 5800X is 22% quicker at rendering the bmw27 scene in Blender. The less time it takes to render, the fastest it is, and the better you’ll be. Remember, here we are looking for the lowest result. Similar to previous single-core testing, turning on PBO actually does make a bigger difference for performance, up 2% here. Single-core Cinebench R23 performance is up 22% with the Ryzen 7 5800X versus the Ryzen 7 3700X. This is impressive considering both have the same core and thread count. In Cinebench R23 multi-core performance the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is up 25% in performance compared to the Ryzen 7 3700X.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |